<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Epic Is Yours?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://markcnewton.com/2008/06/05/how-epic-is-yours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://markcnewton.com/2008/06/05/how-epic-is-yours/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark C Newton</title>
		<link>http://markcnewton.com/2008/06/05/how-epic-is-yours/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark C Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.markcnewton.com/?p=149#comment-233</guid>
		<description>I think in the modern market, Rob, this is definitely the case, you&#039;re right - and it probably remains the main if not only distinction...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think in the modern market, Rob, this is definitely the case, you&#8217;re right &#8211; and it probably remains the main if not only distinction&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob B</title>
		<link>http://markcnewton.com/2008/06/05/how-epic-is-yours/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.markcnewton.com/?p=149#comment-232</guid>
		<description>I see the differences between these two brethren of the genre is that S&amp;S has more of a focus on a singular (or in cases like Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser, some Elric, Kull and Conan stories) two primary characters moving along in the world, whereas Epic Fantasy is concerned more with world shattering events and a larger cast of characters.

There is probably more to it than that, but for me, that&#039;s as good a starting point as any.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the differences between these two brethren of the genre is that S&amp;S has more of a focus on a singular (or in cases like Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser, some Elric, Kull and Conan stories) two primary characters moving along in the world, whereas Epic Fantasy is concerned more with world shattering events and a larger cast of characters.</p>
<p>There is probably more to it than that, but for me, that&#8217;s as good a starting point as any.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark C Newton</title>
		<link>http://markcnewton.com/2008/06/05/how-epic-is-yours/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark C Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.markcnewton.com/?p=149#comment-231</guid>
		<description>I think you have to believe that even science fiction is fantastical, else it isn&#039;t science fiction any more. (All fiction is fantastical, I suppose, but SF relies on it more.) And the fan base is very similar.

Essentially, the rest of the fiction industry hates SF and F, so we best stick together, right? :-)

I can&#039;t remember where I heard it first, but these discussions on the genre divisions usually end with &quot;In conclusion, Jack Vance.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have to believe that even science fiction is fantastical, else it isn&#8217;t science fiction any more. (All fiction is fantastical, I suppose, but SF relies on it more.) And the fan base is very similar.</p>
<p>Essentially, the rest of the fiction industry hates SF and F, so we best stick together, right? <img src='http://markcnewton.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t remember where I heard it first, but these discussions on the genre divisions usually end with &#8220;In conclusion, Jack Vance.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://markcnewton.com/2008/06/05/how-epic-is-yours/comment-page-1/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 12:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.markcnewton.com/?p=149#comment-230</guid>
		<description>You make some good points about Epic fantasy and Swords &amp; Sorcery.  S&amp;S is very pulpy and EF is by definition big &quot;Epic&quot;.

An issue that always bothers me is the pairing of  science fiction and fantasy. How are these two related? Why are they alway paired off  as a single category?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make some good points about Epic fantasy and Swords &amp; Sorcery.  S&amp;S is very pulpy and EF is by definition big &#8220;Epic&#8221;.</p>
<p>An issue that always bothers me is the pairing of  science fiction and fantasy. How are these two related? Why are they alway paired off  as a single category?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: markcnewton.com @ 2012-05-24 02:28:14 -->
