The Skillz Of Online Debate
Depressed by instance on fb [Facebook] of love for one author being predicated on being sh*tty about another author. Enough with the tribalism.
Posted on Jeff VanderMeer’s blog recently:
I also don’t want, anymore, to engage, for the most part, in the kind of heated debate that occurs when you tackle controversial topics—in part because I don’t have the time and in part because 90% of the topics “in play” tend to repeat discussions had time and again on the intertubes and in the meat world over the last 20 years. I feel a bit like saying “Why don’t you just Google it?!?” It’s exhausting.
In particular, any discussions about genre vs mainstream, subculture tribalism of any kind, any generalized discussions about types of fiction that don’t talk in specifics and start from false foundations based on received ideas rather than actual reading…none of this is worth correcting to, engaging with, or in any way acknowledging, and I’m going to try to avoid doing so from this point on.
Joe Abercrombie on internet discussions (before wading into an excellent one):
I must confess that I’ve become jaded of late, though. The internet brimmeth over with stuff, and after a while it all starts to look the same. I just don’t feel the slings and arrows like I used to.
I saw these within a 48-hour period and it seemed to be worth highlighting. Sort yourselves out, internets.
-
Alex C
-
http://aidanmoher.com/blog/ Aidan from A Dribble of Ink
-
http://aidanmoher.com/blog/ Aidan from A Dribble of Ink
-
http://samsykes.com Sam Sykes
-
http://everythingisnice.wordpress.com/ Martin


